We've reached the end of the World Congress on Research Integrity. I'm standing next to Lex Bouter, one of the organisers of this congress. Lex, could you briefly introduce yourself? I work at Amsterdam UMC and at VU Amsterdam where I'm Professor of Methodology and Integrity.Based on everything we've heard, can you give us two examples of where we have already taken many steps and we already see improvements? We can see that collaboration in improving scientific integrity is really taking off. At journals, funding agencies and among researchers as well, but also among research managers, in other words; the leaders of the universities. Now changes are starting to happen, which is very different from the situation five years ago when people were still denying the problem. Instead everyone is now busy looking for solutions. The second thing you notice is that research is also starting, research into research. And it is strange that we haven’t done this before. But now there are groups that are really looking into what needs to be done to realise evidence-based policy that safeguards and improves scientific integrity. Europe is currently leading the way in this. That's already a good start. And can you give two examples of subjects that we still really need to invest in? One important subject we need work on s training the senior researcher. We currently give a lot of training to PhDs and all of them say: “Yes, this is important, this is interesting. But please can you explain it to my supervisors too”. After all, the PhDs return to the department and the lab and discover things are going great in some places, but aren’t so great yet in other places. There are so many developments that it's hardly surprising that people who have been active in research for some time have not been able to really assimilate all of those new things. So we need to pay attention to that. - Yes, yes. That's important. And another important thing, also something I mentioned earlier, is the need for far more research into this important subject. It's about the overall quality of research and not about catching a few fraudulent individuals who falsify data. Rather, it's about the temptations that all researchers are exposed to in a very complex system and network. We want to better understand what's going on so that we can intervene and prevent things from going wrong. ‘Yes, well, that’s very clear. Thanks.- Thank you. It's clear that there's still much to be done in the area of research integrity. We've just heard that the next congress will be held in two years’ time in South Africa. So I hope we'll have made even more progress by then. Thank you. - Thank you.